So here are a few things that are a blasphemy to me, and others I believe:ġ. The 'classic' version was so good that it didn't need any messing around except for more resolution options and the abillity to launch it on newer operating systems. No man, just no, that were my thoughts a few minutes ago when I typed grim in the pause menu. But how about releasing a Crimsonland Classic - just slap a new title on the previous version of the game and give it as a bonus to people who bought the new version. However, I know that asking for a lot of extra work from you is unrealistic and unfair, especially since you already spent a lot of time fixing it up for the Steam release. Leaderboards wouldn't be an issue if you made it so only the scores achieved under default settings would register. If there was an options menu to tweak settings and personalize the game to each customer's liking, it would be much better. I'm not calling for anyone's head on a pike, I just want to be able to play the classic version of the game. Judging from many other reactions, I'm not alone in thinking that what was released is not the game we voted for. The game was greenlit almost entirely by fans of the classic Crimsonland. My brother and I loved playing this when it came out years ago, but this new and "improved" version is terrible. That's a pretty harsh title, but that's how I feel.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |